Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Husserl and Disjunctivism : Reply to Bower. / Overgaard, Søren.

In: Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2023, p. 499-513.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Overgaard, S 2023, 'Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower', Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.a902881

APA

Overgaard, S. (2023). Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 61(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.a902881

Vancouver

Overgaard S. Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 2023;61(3):499-513. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.a902881

Author

Overgaard, Søren. / Husserl and Disjunctivism : Reply to Bower. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy. 2023 ; Vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 499-513.

Bibtex

@article{25992eb8633a44b0b535d7c9e7519552,
title = "Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower",
abstract = "In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Matt Bower argues forcefully against A. D. Smith's interpretation of Husserl as a disjunctivist. But I argue in this discussion note that the disjunctive reading of Husserl remains plausible. For it seems Husserl was committed to the idea that perceptions essentially have singular contents, while hallucinations do not.",
author = "S{\o}ren Overgaard",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1353/hph.2023.a902881",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "499--513",
journal = "Journal of the History of Philosophy",
issn = "0022-5053",
publisher = "TheJohns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Husserl and Disjunctivism

T2 - Reply to Bower

AU - Overgaard, Søren

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Matt Bower argues forcefully against A. D. Smith's interpretation of Husserl as a disjunctivist. But I argue in this discussion note that the disjunctive reading of Husserl remains plausible. For it seems Husserl was committed to the idea that perceptions essentially have singular contents, while hallucinations do not.

AB - In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Matt Bower argues forcefully against A. D. Smith's interpretation of Husserl as a disjunctivist. But I argue in this discussion note that the disjunctive reading of Husserl remains plausible. For it seems Husserl was committed to the idea that perceptions essentially have singular contents, while hallucinations do not.

U2 - 10.1353/hph.2023.a902881

DO - 10.1353/hph.2023.a902881

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

SP - 499

EP - 513

JO - Journal of the History of Philosophy

JF - Journal of the History of Philosophy

SN - 0022-5053

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 307125892