Husserl and Disjunctivism: Reply to Bower
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
In a recent issue of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Matt Bower argues forcefully against A. D. Smith's interpretation of Husserl as a disjunctivist. But I argue in this discussion note that the disjunctive reading of Husserl remains plausible. For it seems Husserl was committed to the idea that perceptions essentially have singular contents, while hallucinations do not.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of the History of Philosophy |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 499-513 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISSN | 0022-5053 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
ID: 307125892